Introduction
Value education has become an integral part of modern schooling, aiming to develop moral reasoning, empathy, and ethical behavior among students. To achieve this, different models of value education are used.
Two widely recognized models are:
Value Clarification Model
Jurisprudential Inquiry Model
These models encourage learners to explore values, resolve conflicts, and make responsible decisions
1. Value Clarification Model
The Value Clarification Model was developed by Louis Raths, Merrill Harmin, and Sidney Simon in the 1960s. It emphasizes helping students to identify, examine, and develop their own personal values rather than imposing predefined values.
Key Features:
Students are encouraged to clarify their own beliefs and attitudes.
Teachers act as facilitators, not moral preachers.
Emphasis on self-reflection, decision-making, and discussion.
Focuses on choices, consequences, and commitment.
Teaching Methods:
Group discussions
Role-playing and case studies
Value analysis worksheets
“What would you do?” activities
Example in Classroom:
A teacher presents a situation: “If you found a wallet with money on the road, what would you do?” Students discuss possible actions and clarify their values regarding honesty, responsibility, and empathy.
2. Jurisprudential Inquiry Model
The Jurisprudential Inquiry Model was developed by Donald Oliver and James Shaver. It is based on legal education and democratic decision-making. The model aims to develop critical thinking, reasoning, and conflict resolution skills among students by discussing social, legal, and moral dilemmas.
Key Features:
Focuses on controversial issues that involve conflicting values.
Encourages students to analyze public policy, laws, and ethical conflicts.
Promotes logical reasoning, debate, and tolerance for diverse opinions.
Trains students to participate in democratic processes.
Teaching Methods:
Debate and group discussions on social issues
Analyzing case laws or constitutional dilemmas
Identifying conflicts between individual rights vs. social responsibilities
Developing arguments and counterarguments
Example in Classroom:
A teacher poses a dilemma: “Should freedom of expression allow hate speech?” Students debate both sides, apply legal reasoning, and reflect on democratic values, justice, and equality.
Comparison of Value Clarification and Jurisprudential Inquiry Model
| Aspect | Value Clarification Model | Jurisprudential Inquiry Model |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Personal values and self-reflection | Social, legal, and moral conflicts |
| Approach | Individual choice and decision-making | Democratic reasoning and public debate |
| Role of Teacher | Facilitator, guide | Moderator, debate leader |
| Method | Case studies, role-play, worksheets | Discussions, debates, analysis of dilemmas |
| Outcome | Clarity of personal values | Critical thinking and civic responsibility |
Importance of These Models
Value Clarification Model helps learners to develop self-awareness and personal responsibility.
Jurisprudential Inquiry Model trains students in critical thinking, tolerance, and democratic citizenship.
Together, they create a balanced approach to value education by combining personal reflection with social reasoning.
Conclusion
The models of value education such as the Value Clarification Model and Jurisprudential Inquiry Model are effective strategies for promoting moral development. While the former focuses on personal decision-making, the latter develops rational thinking and social responsibility.
By incorporating these models into education, schools can prepare students not only to succeed academically but also to become ethical, empathetic, and responsible citizens of society.
Discover more from YOUR SMART CLASS
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
