1. Introduction
Research is an essential part of education and other fields, helping to improve knowledge, solve problems, and develop new strategies. Among the many types of research, Fundamental Research and Action Research are widely used in the field of education.
Although both involve systematic investigation, their purpose, scope, and application differ greatly. Understanding these differences helps educators, scholars, and students choose the right research method for their goals.
2. Meaning of Fundamental Research
Fundamental Research, also called basic or pure research, is conducted primarily to expand existing knowledge or develop new theories without an immediate practical application in mind.
Key Points:
Aims at advancing theory and knowledge.
Not focused on solving a specific, immediate problem.
Results may be applied in the long term.
Example:
A study exploring how the human brain processes different types of memory is Fundamental Research. The findings may later be used in education or technology, but the main goal is to increase understanding.
3. Meaning of Action Research
Action Research is a practical, problem-solving approach conducted by teachers, educators, or professionals to address specific issues and improve practices in real-world settings.
Key Points:
Aims to solve immediate problems in a specific context.
Conducted by practitioners, often in their own work environment.
Involves a cycle of planning, action, observation, and reflection.
Example:
A teacher testing a new reading strategy to improve students’ comprehension skills in their class is conducting Action Research.
4. Characteristics of Fundamental Research
Theoretical in Nature – Seeks to expand knowledge and develop theories.
Long-term Focus – Results may be used later in applied settings.
Objective-Oriented – Follows strict scientific methods.
Universal Application – Findings are generally applicable across different contexts.
No Immediate Problem-Solving – Not designed to address specific local issues.
5. Characteristics of Action Research
Problem-Specific – Aims to solve particular issues in a specific setting.
Practical and Immediate – Directly improves current practices.
Participatory – Involves collaboration among researchers and participants.
Cyclical Process – Includes planning, acting, observing, and reflecting.
Context-Bound – Results may not apply to other situations.
6. Objectives of Fundamental vs Action Research
| Aspect | Fundamental Research | Action Research |
|---|---|---|
| Main Aim | To expand knowledge and develop theories | To solve specific problems in real settings |
| Scope | Broad and general | Narrow and focused |
| Application | Long-term, often indirect | Immediate and direct |
| Researcher Role | Usually conducted by academic researchers | Conducted by practitioners (e.g., teachers) |
| Outcome | Generates theoretical insights | Improves practices and processes |
7. Key Differences Between Fundamental and Action Research
| Basis of Difference | Fundamental Research | Action Research |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Knowledge creation | Problem-solving |
| Nature | Theoretical | Practical |
| Timeframe | Long-term benefits | Immediate results |
| Applicability | Universal | Context-specific |
| Participants | Experts, scholars | Practitioners and stakeholders |
| Approach | Deductive reasoning | Inductive and iterative process |
| Flexibility | More structured | Flexible and adaptive |
| Example | Studying how memory affects learning | Trying new teaching methods to improve student performance |
8. Examples in Education
Example of Fundamental Research in Education:
Studying the effects of cognitive development stages on student learning abilities.
Example of Action Research in Education:
Implementing peer tutoring to improve mathematics performance in a particular classroom.
9. Importance in Education
Why Fundamental Research is Important:
Expands the theoretical foundation of education.
Provides knowledge that can inspire new teaching methods.
Contributes to policy-making in the long run.
Why Action Research is Important:
Offers immediate solutions to classroom problems.
Encourages teachers’ professional growth.
Improves student engagement and performance quickly.
10. Conclusion
Both Fundamental Research and Action Research are valuable in education, but they serve different purposes.
Fundamental Research builds the theoretical foundation, paving the way for future applications.
Action Research provides immediate, practical solutions to real-world problems.
Educators and researchers should choose the method based on whether their goal is to gain new knowledge or improve current practices.
Discover more from YOUR SMART CLASS
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
